- — Byron
Monday, September 29, 2008
Parallelism II
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Parallelism
Monday, September 22, 2008
Split Infinitives
Split Infinitives
The infinitive form of the verb consists of the word "to" followed by the base form of the verb: "to be," "to serve," "to chop," etc. Inserting a word or words between the "to" and the verb of an infinitive creates what is known as a split infinitive. Prescriptive grammarians, who knew Latin grammar better than English, once decreed that a split infinitive was an error, but now it is growing increasingly acceptable even in formal writing. Nevertheless, some careful writers still prefer to avoid splitting infinitives altogether.
In general, you should avoid placing long, disruptive modifiers between the "to" and the verb of an infinitive. However, you must use your judgement when it comes to single-word modifiers. Sometimes a sentence becomes awkward if a single-word modifier is placed anywhere but between the elements of the infinitive:
- [WRONG] The marketing team voted to, before they launched the new software, run an anticipatory ad campaign. (disruptive -- the infinitive should not be split)
- [RIGHT] The marketing team voted to run an anticipatory ad campaign before they launched the new software.
Dangling Modifiers
Dangling Modifiers
The dangling modifier, a persistent and frequent grammatical problem in writing, is often (though not always) located at the beginning of a sentence. A dangling modifier is usually a phrase or anelliptical clause -- a dependent clause whose subject and verb are implied rather than expressed -- that functions as an adjective but does not modify any specific word in the sentence, or (worse) modifies the wrong word. Consider the following example:
- Raised in Nova Scotia, it is natural to miss the smell of the sea.
The introductory phrase in the above sentence looks as if it is meant to modify a person or persons, but no one is mentioned in the sentence. Such introductory adjective phrases, because of their position, automatically modify the first noun or pronoun that follows the phrase -- in this case, "it." The connection in this case is illogical because "it" was not raised in Nova Scotia. You could revise the sentence in a number of ways:
- For a person raised in Nova Scotia, it is natural to miss the smell of the sea. (the phrase no longer functions as an adjective)
- Raised in Nova Scotia, I often miss the smell of the sea. (the phrase functions as an adjective but now automatically modifies "I," a logical connection)
A dangling modifier can also appear when you place an elliptical clause improperly:
- Although nearly finished, we left the play early because we were worried about our sick cat.
The way this sentence is structured, the clause "Although nearly finished" illogically modifies "we," the pronoun directly following the clause. An easy way to rectify the problem is to re-insert the subject and verb that are understood in the elliptical clause:
- Although the play was nearly finished, we left early because we were worried about our sick cat.
Modifiers
Thursday, September 18, 2008
Less vs Fewer
A. there are less than one-quarter that many
B. there are fewer than one-quarter as many
C. there are fewer than one-quarter of that amount
D. the number is less than one-quarter the amount
E. it is less than one-quarter of that amount
Ellipsis
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
Throat Clearing Phrases
It is important to remember that in our legal system the jury must convict only upon evidence that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Better: The jury must convict only upon evidence that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Petitioner contends in this Court that Respondent's actions violate the First Amendment.
Better: The Respondent's actions violate the First Amendment.
Pronoun Errors
Once you start with one, you need to stay in the same quantity (singular or plural).basically it means if we talk about one cat,we talk about one cat not ten .
§Singular Pronouns (Memorize these)
Hint: Do you see the categories I setup? It's SANE to memorize this
Some---
Any—
No—
Every—
Everyone,Everybody,Everything
Someone,Somebody,Something
Either,Neither,One,Each
Anyone,Anybody,Anything
No one,Nothing,Nobody
Whoever,Whomever
His
whenever we use these these are singular in nature ..each one of us has ..not have.. singular natureshould be kept in mind.
§Be aware that group, jury, team, country, family are singular. Society today uses them sometimes as plural. This is because these act as a single unit when they do something.
§Plural Pronouns (Memorize these)
Both,Their,Many,Several,Few,Others
§Singular and Plural Pronouns – depends on whether the noun is singular or plural (Memorize these)
Some,More,Most,All,
§The plural and singular clause error
When two nouns are in the sentence doing an action together but they are linked with
i)Along with
ii)Together with
iii)With
iv)As well as
v)In addition to
vi)Accompanied by
are all singular in nature
… this does not make the following action they do plural. Only "and" can take the two singulars and make their action plural.
For example
Janie, with her poodle limping behind her, walks to the dog park.
Explanation: Janie is singular. The poodle is singular. They both do the action together, but the use of "with" means that we need to keep the verb singular. "Walks" is singular and "Walk" is plural.
Remember, a verb that ends with an –s is singular.
ps : reminds me of a song from khuda ke liye movie janie ..
Pronoun reference error- referring pronoun is not correctly placed.
For example:
In the sentence "Samantha and Jane went shopping, but she couldn't find anything she liked.", the pronoun "she" does not refer to a person unambiguously. It is difficult to understand that whether "she" is referring to Samantha or Jane.
The correct form would be "Samantha and Jane went shopping, but Samantha couldn't find anything she liked."
Relative pronouns are often used incorrectly today.
1)Referring to things or animals – that, which
2)Referring to people—who, whom
3)They – be careful that you don't use this unless you're positive there is a referring noun. Today we often use "they" to replace the use of a proper noun which it is not. It's a Pronoun.
Use "that" with restrictive clauses. A restrictive clause is one that limits -- or restricts --the identity of the subject in some way. When writing a restrictive clause, introduce it with the word "that" and no comma. (However, if the subject is or was a human being, use "who" to introduce the clause.)
Correct Restrictive Use:
The painting that was hanging in the foyer was stolen.
Explanation: The use of "that" in this sentence is correct if the reader intends to single out the one painting that was in the foyer as the stolen painting. However, if there were several paintings hanging in the foyer, this use would be incorrect, since it would mislead the reader into believing that there had been only one painting in the foyer. The restriction here tells us that the one painting that had been hanging in the foyer was stolen -- not the painting in the living room, or the one in the drawing room, or any of those in the parlor.
Use "which" with nonrestrictive clauses. A nonrestrictive clause may tell us something interesting or incidental about a subject, but it does not define that subject. When writing a nonrestrictive clause, introduce it with "which" and insert commas around the clause. (However, if the subject is or was a human being, use "who" to introduce the clause and insert commas around the clause.)
Correct Nonrestrictive Use:
The painting, which was hanging in the foyer, was stolen.
Explanation: While this nonrestrictive use tells us that the painting was hanging in the foyer, it does not tell us which of the several paintings in the foyer was the stolen painting. It would be incorrect to use this nonrestrictive clause if there had been only one painting in the foyer, as the sentence leaves open the possibility that there were others.
Combining Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Clauses. One can provide both limiting and nonlimiting information about a subject in a single sentence. Consider the following.Correct Use of Both Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Clauses:
The Van Gogh that was hanging in the foyer, which we purchased in 1929 for $10,000, was stolen.
Explanation: The restrictive clause beginning with "that" tells us that there was only one Van Gogh hanging in the foyer and that it was stolen. The nonrestrictive clause beginning with "which" tells us what the owner had paid for the painting, but it does not tell us that the owner did not pay another $10,000 for another painting in the same year. It does not limit the possibilities to the Van Gogh that was in the foyer.
Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Clauses beginning with "Who." When writing about human beings, we use "who" rather than "that" or "which" to introduce a clause telling us something about that human being. Since "who" is the only option, we distinguish between a restrictive use and a nonrestrictive use by the use of commas.
Correct Restrictive Use:
The suspect in the lineup who has red hair committed the crime.
Note how the subject "suspect" in this sentence is restricted in two ways: we know that this suspect is both in the lineup and has red hair. As a result, we know that the other suspects, who are not in the lineup, could not have committed the crime. Moreover, of those suspects in the lineup, we know that the one suspect in the lineup with red hair committed the crime. If there were more than one suspect in the lineup with red hair, the above usage would be incorrect because it implies a different meaning.
Correct Nonrestrictive Use:
The suspect in the lineup, who owns a red car, committed the crime.
In this example, the restrictive clause "in the lineup" tells us that of all possible suspects in the world, the one who committed the crime is in the lineup. However, while the nonrestrictive clause "who owns a red car" tells us something about the suspect, it does not foreclose the possibility that there are several different suspects in the lineup with red cars. The car color may tell us something useful, but it does not restrict us to only one possibility.
Thursday, September 11, 2008
FIJ Fundas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FACTS:deal with pieces of information that one has heard, seen or read, and which are open to discovery or verification. The key word here is “verification”. A fact is a statement that can be ‘verified’, i.e. a fact is either true or false. Facts are statements that may involve numbers, natural phenomena, dates etc. The characteristics of the statements classified as facts are:
·Made after observation or experience. An event cannot become a fact unless it has occurred.
·Confined to what one observes; cannot be made about the future.
·Limited number possible.
·Not perception dependent. A fact will be agreed to by every person. It does not change from person to person.
·Tends to bring people together in agreement.
Examples:
1)Nearly 2 lac students took CAT last year.
2)Life exists on other planets (although physically not possible to verify, this statement will be either true or false).
3)I like Pink Floyd more than Metallica (It may not seem so, but this statement is either true or false. Either I like Pink Floyd more than Metallica or I don’t).
4)The legislature is advocating vigorously against intrusion of judiciary in parliamentary affairs.
5)A football field is 100 yards long.
NOTE: Notice the difference when a sentence contains subjective or abstract expressions-
6)The music was very loud (NOT a fact as the loudness might vary from person to person).
7)I found the music very loud (A fact as it is either a truth or a lie. I must have found the music very loud or not very loud).
9)20% of the population live below poverty line (Fact).
‘FACTS’ STATEMENTS IN CAT 2006 PAPER:
1)The government has been supplying free drugs since 2004, and 35 000 have benefited up to now- though the size of the affected population is 150 times this number.
2)Only about 13 million children in the age group of 6 to 14 years are out of school.
3)The truth is that we have more red tape- we take eighty- nine days to start a small business, Australians take two.
4)The economies of the industrialized western world derive 20% of their income from the sale of all kinds of arms.
INFERENCES:are conclusions drawn about the unknown, on the basis of the known. Notice the three words ‘conclusions’, ‘known’ and ‘unknown’ very carefully. They will give you complete description of what an inference consists of-
·Known- A fact. The first thing an inference should consist of is a fact. This fact is required to prove another proposition.
·Unknown- Something which can be logically proven by the given fact or the ‘known’. Therefore, in an inference an unknown proposition is present which is to be proven with the help of the fact. Remember that this proposition has to be proven with the help of another fact.
·Conclusion- Once the unknown has been proved with the help of the known (fact) it is called a conclusion.
Notice the meaning of the word ‘Infer’. To infer means
·to conclude from evidence; to deduce
·to have a logical consequence. (an inference = a conclusion)
Therefore, the process of inference can be summarized by the figure given below:
Examples:
1)Because the old man stayed indoors all the time and did not receive any visitors, no one discovered his dead body for days.
(the green part is the fact and the brown part is the conclusion. Notice that without the explanation given by the fact, you cannot convincingly prove the conclusion.)
2)The footprint warned Robinson Crusoe that there was someone else on the island.
‘INFERENCE’ STATEMENTS IN CAT 2006 PAPER:
(the facts are in green and the conclusions are in brown)
1)The recent initiatives of networks and companies like AIDScare Network, Emcure, Reliance-Cipla-CII, would lead to availability of much-needed drugs to a larger number of affected people.
2)According to all statistical indications, the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan has managed to keep pace with its ambitious goals.
3)Every red tape procedure is a point of contact with an official, and such contacts have the potential to become opportunities for money to change hands.
4)Even without war, we know that conflicts continue to trouble us- they only change in color.
JUDGEMENTS:are opinions that imply approval or disapproval of persons, objects, situations, and occurrences in the past, the present or the future. There is a fine line of distinction between inferences and judgments. Most of the times judgments are also based on facts and therefore they seem like inferences. But there are some ways to differentiate a judgment and an inference-
·Judgments are arguable and contestable. Inferences are rock solid. Although both judgments and inferences are based on facts, in the latter the conclusion is so unquestionable that it becomes fact itself.
·Judgments are opinions, suggestions and recommendations whereas inferences are proven conditions.
·Judgment statements include a lot of quantities that cannot be measured, such as happiness, beauty, joy etc.
·Many a times, judgments are not accompanied by facts at all but are only opinion statements. When there is no fact involved, the statement can only be a judgment statement.
·A judgment is an honest attempt to make reasonable observations about the given facts but they do not conclusively prove anything.
Examples:
1)It is estimated that that 30% of Indians live below poverty line. (judgment: if it is an estimate, it cannot be a fact).
2)Every mother has only the best interests of her children at her heart. (Is there a way to look inside a mother’s heart?).
3)Because we had three wars with our neighboring country, we should keep our armed forced ready for the fourth one.
‘JUDGMENT’ STATEMENTS IN CAT 2006 PAPER:
1)So much of our day-to-day focus seems to be on getting thins done, trudging our way through the tasks of living- it can feel like a treadmill that gets you nowhere; where is the childlike joy?
2)We are not doing things that make us happy; that which brings us joy; the things that we cannot wait to do because we enjoy them so much.
3)This is the stuff that joyful living is made of- identifying your calling and committing yourself wholeheartedly to it.
4)When this happens, each moment becomes a celebration of you; there is a rush of energy that comes with feeling completely immersed in doing what you love most.
5)Given the poor quality of service in the public service, the HIV/AIDS affected should be switching to private initiatives that supply anti-retroviral drugs (ARVs) at a low cost.
6)But how ironic it is that we should face a perennial shortage of drugs when India is one of the world’s largest suppliers of generic drugs to the developing world.
7)The Mid-day Meal scheme has been a significant incentive for the poor to send their little ones to school, thus establishing the vital link between healthy bodies and healthy minds.
9)We should not be hopelessly addicted to an erroneous belief that corruption in India is caused by the crookedness of Indians.
10)Red tape leads to corruption and distorts people’s character.
11)Inequitable distribution of all kinds of resources is certainly one of the strongest and most sinister sources of conflict.
12)Extensive disarmament is the only insurance for our future; imagine the amount of resources that can be released and redeployed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Saturday, September 6, 2008
Subject Verb Agreement
Tuesday, September 2, 2008
Problem of the Day
Take a three by three square grid which has the number '1' already inserted in the third row, middle square. You have to complete it by putting eight different prime numbers in the remaining eight empty squares, so that the rows, columns and diagonals add up to the same total; and it must be the smallest possible total under the conditions. Also, the number in the middle square is the average of the two numbers directly above and directly below it and the third largest number is not in the right-hand column, and every square contains one or two digits.
Monday, September 1, 2008
Angelina Jolie says Brad Pitt smells 'badly'

Do these sentences have the same meaning?
Do these sentences have the same meaning?
1. You'll get through to.
2. You'll be put through to.
3. You'll go through to.
Problem of the Week 1
we start with a logical reasoning problem
Problem 1
A, B, C, D and E decide to run a race. Before the race, five predictions of the outcome are made: (1) ECBAD (as in A first, C second, etc), (2) DAECB, (3) DCBAE, (4) BDAEC, (5) DCBEA. No prediction was completely correct but two of them correctly predicted the placements of exactly two of the runners. The remaining three predictions were totally wrong. What was the actual outcome of the race?